Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris) ; 180(9): 912-914, 2022 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2112976

ABSTRACT

During the first wave of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Colmar hospital was at the epicenter of the pandemic in France because of a religious gathering that caused a wave of contamination. In order to face the growing wave of admissions in intensive care, the state in partnership with the army set up the operation MORPHEE aiming at transferring intubated patients to other hospitals. On their return to Alsace, the inter-service liaison psychiatry team was called upon for several of them who presented psychotic disorders on waking up, even though they had no previous psychiatric history, and who had resolved spontaneously. These pictures do not correspond to the delirious pictures usually observed in the ICU, such as "reanimatory black-holes" or "near-death-experience". No iatrogenic origin was found and the imaging examinations do not allow to explain this picture; therefore, we cannot exclude that this picture could be a neurological manifestation of COVID-19. The disorder appeared to be spontaneously resolving, so we would urge caution about a drug approach to this problem.

3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 21(1): 465, 2021 09 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1438265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 'lockdown' measures, adopted to restrict population movements in order to help curb the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, contributed to a global mental health crisis. Although several studies have extensively examined the impact of lockdown measures on the psychological well-being of the general population, little is known about long-term implications. This study aimed to identify changes in psychiatric emergency department (ED) admissions between two 8-week periods: during and immediately after lifting the lockdown. METHODS: Socio-demographic and clinical information on 1477 psychiatric ED consultations at the University Hospital of Geneva (HUG) were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: When grouped according to admission dates, contrary to what we expected, the post-lockdown group presented with more severe clinical conditions (as measured using an urgency degree index) compared to their lockdown counterparts. Notably, after the lockdown had been lifted we observed a statistically significant increase in suicidal behavior and psychomotor agitation and a decrease in behavior disorder diagnoses. Furthermore, more migrants arrived at the HUG ED after the lockdown measures had been lifted. Logistic regression analysis identified diagnoses of suicidal behavior, behavioral disorders, psychomotor agitation, migrant status, involuntary admission, and private resident discharge as predictors of post-lockdown admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings can have implications concerning the prioritization of mental health care facilities and access for patients at risk of psychopathological decompensation in time of confinement policies, but above all, provide a foundation for future studies focusing on the long-term impact of the pandemic and its associated sanitary measures on mental health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Research Ethics Committee of Geneva, Registration number 2020-01510, approval date: 29 June 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Communicable Disease Control , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 75(6): 465-471, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1101760

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Cycloid psychosis (CP) is a clinical entity characterized by sudden onset of psychotic polymorphic symptomatology and fluctuant course. It has a reported rate of psychosocial precipitating factors ranging 30-65%. The aim of the study was to describe all cases of CP, admitted in our Psychiatry ward, during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In this retrospective and observational study, we reported a sample of eight patients who were treated as inpatients in the psychiatric ward of our hospital during the first two months of COVID-19 pandemic (mid-March to mid-May 2020) and compared it with previous years. All our patients fulfilled all four Perris & Brockington criteria for CP. We reported the sociodemographic, clinical and biological parameters. RESULTS: In our sample, all of the patients had maladaptive personality traits; the major external stressing factor was COVID-19; all our patients had short prodromal symptomatology, short Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) and high score at the Positive Scale at Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-P) at hospital admission with the majority showing psychotic symptoms related to the actual COVID-19 pandemic. The predominant treatment during admission was olanzapine and a short time to full remission of psychotic symptoms was observed in all patients. CONCLUSION: We found an increase in the admission of patients with CP during the first two months of the actual pandemic. Stress caused by the COVID-19 situation has possibly incremented the frequency of stress-related disorders and it has also influenced its clinical presentation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychotic Disorders , Humans , Pandemics , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Psychiatry Res ; 298: 113802, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1078137

ABSTRACT

The ongoing Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic appears to increase risk for mental illness, either directly due to inflammation caused by the virus or indirectly due to related psychosocial stress, resulting in the development of both anxious-depressive and psychotic symptoms. The purpose of the present study was to assess the frequency and characteristics of all patients with First Episodes Psychosis (FEP) without COVID-19 infection hospitalized in the first four months since lockdown in Milan. We recruited sixty-two patients hospitalized between March 8 to July 8, 2020 versus those first  hospitalized in the same period in 2019. The two subgroups were compared for sociodemographic variables and clinical characteristics of the episodes. Patients with FEP in 2020 were significantly older than patients with FEP in 2021, and presented with significantly less substances abuse. Interestingly, patients presenting with FEP in 2020 were significantly older than patients with FEP in 2019. These data are compatible with the greater vulnerability to stressful factors during the pandemic, as well as with the greater concern regarding a possible COVID-19 infection producing brain damage causing the FEP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Hospitalization , Psychotic Disorders , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/therapy
6.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(3)2021 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1055057

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health emergency with profound mental health consequences. The psychiatric emergency department (ED) plays a key role during this mental health crisis. This study aimed to investigate differences in admissions at a Swiss psychiatric ED from 1 April to 15 May during a "pandemic-free" period in 2016 and a "during-pandemic" period in 2020. The study included 579 consultations at psychiatric ED in the "during-pandemic" period and 702 in the "pandemic-free" period. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were compared, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with psychiatric admissions during the pandemic. A reduction in total psychiatric ED admissions was documented during COVID-19. Logistic regression analysis predicted the independent variable (ED admission during the pandemic) and estimated odds ratio (OR) for being unmarried/not in a relationship, arrival in an ambulance, suicidal behavior, behavioral disorders and psychomotor agitation. Though only statistically significant in bivariate analysis, patients were also more likely to be involuntarily hospitalized. This picture appears to be reversed from a sociodemographic and clinical point of view to our observation of psychiatric ED consultation in 2016. These findings highlight that the reduction in psychiatric ED admissions during the pandemic seems to be associated with living alone and more severe psychopathologies, which must alert psychiatrists to ensure access to mental health care in times of pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mental Health , Switzerland/epidemiology
7.
Schizophr Bull ; 47(1): 15-22, 2021 01 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1045828

ABSTRACT

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosis remains to be established. Here we report 6 cases (3 male and 3 female) of first-episode psychosis (FEP) admitted to our hospital in the second month of national lockdown. All patients underwent routine laboratory tests and a standardized assessment of psychopathology. Hospitalization was required due to the severity of behavioral abnormalities in the context of a full-blown psychosis (the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [BPRS] = 75.8 ± 14.6). Blood tests, toxicological urine screening, and brain imaging were unremarkable, with the exception of a mild cortical atrophy in the eldest patient (male, 73 years). All patients were negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) throughout their stay, but 3 presented the somatic delusion of being infected. Of note, all 6 cases had religious/spiritual delusions and hallucinatory contents. Despite a generally advanced age (53.3 ± 15.6), all patients had a negative psychiatric history. Rapid discharge (length of stay = 13.8 ± 6.9) with remission of symptoms (BPRS = 27.5 ± 3.1) and satisfactory insight were possible after relatively low-dose antipsychotic treatment (Olanzapine-equivalents = 10.1 ± 5.1 mg). Brief psychotic disorder/acute and transient psychotic disorder diagnoses were confirmed during follow-up visits in all 6 cases. The youngest patient (female, 23 years) also satisfied the available criteria for brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms. Although research on larger populations is necessary, our preliminary observation suggests that intense psychosocial stress associated with a novel, potentially fatal disease and national lockdown restrictions might be a trigger for FEP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Delusions , Hallucinations , Psychotic Disorders , Stress, Psychological/complications , Adult , Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Delusions/diagnosis , Delusions/drug therapy , Delusions/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hallucinations/diagnosis , Hallucinations/drug therapy , Hallucinations/etiology , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Remission Induction , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL